October 4, 2021 – Further to the Debtors' request, the Court hearing the Forever 21 Cases has issued an order approving procedures for the dismissal of the Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases [Docket No. 2118]. The order follows the late resolution of an objection filed by the U.S. Trustee assigned to the Debtors' case which had argued that the Debtors' proposals for the distribution of an estimated $35.0mn would fail to provide uniform procedural protections for all remaining creditors with a possible claim on that $35.0mn pie; and that conversion of the cases to Chapter 7 would provide a more orderly process. The Court order now encompasses the adoption of "certain [additional] procedures to govern the reconciliation, resolution, and allowance of claims asserted against the Debtors and the distribution to be made to holders of such claims" that will involve an oversight role for the U.S. Trustee.
The order also notes that the Debtors' professionals have agreed to forego some fees with new language in the order now providing (see also Docket No. 2113 for a blackline): "…counsel to the Debtors having made representations on the record at the Hearing concerning the agreement of certain of the Debtors’ professionals not to seek allowance or payment of fees or reimbursement of expenses for the period commencing on July 18, 2020, through the closing of these chapter 11 cases if the Motion is granted; and, in light of such representations, and certain modifications reflected in this Order and the proposed forms of subsequent orders attached as exhibits hereto, the Office of the United States Trustee (the ‘U.S. Trustee’) having withdrawn both its objection to the Motion…"
The Debtors' filed for Chapter 11 in September 2019, noting that "Forever 21 is a story about family and the 'American Dream'," and insisting that they would continue that dream and "prosper for years to come" with the "support from our key landlord and vendor constituents." Those vendors, unsecured trade creditors, were owed over $350.0mn, with unpaid for inventory serving as collateral for aggressive borrowing used to finance aggressive growth. Rarely has a house of cards collapsed so emphatically, with these Debtors not even able to make good on administrative claims much less the staggering $350.0mn of trade debt generously spread from Africa to China.
As detailed below, the Debtors' $81.1mn sale of substantially all of their to a consortium comprised of Simon Property Group, Brookfield Property Partners and Authentic Brands Group closed more than 18 months ago.
The Dismissal Procedures Motion
The Debtors Dismissal motion [Docket No. 282] notes, “After considering all potential alternatives to bring these chapter 11 cases to a value maximizing conclusion, the Debtors have determined that a dismissal of these chapter 11 cases is the most expeditious and cost-effective mechanism to wind down the Debtors’ affairs and maximize recoveries for holders of allowed Administrative Claims and Secured Claims.
A dismissal will result in greater recoveries for holders of Administrative Claims and Secured Claims and ensure a faster and less costly completion of these chapter 11 cases as compared to a conversion to chapter 7. The fees and commissions incurred by a chapter 7 trustee and its professionals alone justify dismissal of these cases. The Debtors estimate that the proceeds available for distribution through the structured dismissal contemplated by the Order could amount to approximately $34.5 to $35.3 million. In the event these chapter 11 cases are converted to cases under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors estimate that the distributable proceeds could be equal to approximately $25.2 to $26.9 million after taking into account additional chapter 7 expenses. Conversion to chapter 7 would also likely further delay distributions to holders of allowed Administrative Claims and Secured Claims, as a chapter 7 trustee would need to spend time familiarizing itself with these cases through the engagement of new professionals.
Because the Debtors’ cases have been fully administered, conversion to chapter 7 and a corresponding liquidation is unnecessary and unlikely to generate additional value. The few corporate actions that remain outstanding—filing final tax returns and dissolving the Debtors’ corporate existence (or analogous limited liability company actions)—do not require a chapter 7 trustee’s oversight. Therefore, conversion to chapter 7 cases will merely add another layer of unnecessary additional administrative expenses, which would need to be paid in full before any holders of Administrative Claims and Secured Claims could receive any recovery on account of their claims.
The Order sets forth the process for dismissing the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases through a structured, Court-supervised process that balances the interests of holders of Administrative Claims in receiving prompt distributions, with the Court’s interest in ensuring the Debtors’ limited assets are distributed in a fair manner that comports with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. A central component of the Order is an expedited claims resolution process for determining the allowed amount of Administrative Claims and Secured Claims. This process provides parties in interest with notice and an opportunity to object to their proposed treatment and is structured in a manner substantially similar to this Court’s order…
The U.S. Trustee Objection to Dismissal
On September 23rd, the U.S. Trustee assigned to the Debtors' cases objected to the Debtors' dismissal motion, arguing that with "significant assets available for distribution, conversion rather than dismissal is in the best interests of creditors and the estates" [Docket No. 2104]. The objection continued: ". In essence, what the Debtors seek is approval to reconcile claims and make distributions in the manner they would have done if their previously proposed plan had been confirmed. Then, only after that process is complete, do they seek dismissal of their cases. The Debtors’ proposal is simply not an option under the Code for cases, such as the present, in which the Debtors cannot confirm a plan. Rather, the options for these Debtors are either conversion to chapter 7 or a plain dismissal. Here, where there are significant assets available for distribution, conversion rather than dismissal is in the best interests of creditors and the estates, because dismissal could result in a race to the courthouse by claimants to recover against those assets.
The U.S Trustee also accused the Debtors of improperly seeking "expansive relief" to which they are not entitled, including "approval to reconcile claims and make [$35.0mn of] distributions in the manner they would have done if their previously proposed plan had been confirmed." That is of course something that did not happen, the Debtors having had their motion for approval of their Disclosure Statement emphatically denied (after an earlier U.S. Trustee objection) on July 29th because the underlying Plan "fails to satisfy section 1129(a)(9) [ie pay holders of administrative claims] of the Bankruptcy Code and is therefore patently unconfirmable.”
The U.S. Trustee urged the Court not to allow the Debtors "to make distributions of approximately $35 million to certain creditors and claimants, and thereafter wrap-up their estates, without the procedural protections afforded to creditors by the Bankruptcy Code."
On February 13, 2020, the Court hearing the Debtors’ cases issued an order [Docket No. 927] approving the $81.1mn sale of substantially all of the Debtors’ assets to F21 OpCo, LLC (the “Buyer,” a consortium comprised of Simon Property Group, Brookfield Property Partners and Authentic Brands Group). The sale closed on February 19, 2020.
Between them, Simon Property Group and Brookfield Property are the lessors in respect of more than 180 of the Debtors’ leases. Authentic Brands Group (“ABG,” 30% owned by BlackRock Inc.) owns more than 50 consumer brands.
Petition Date Perspective
On September 29, 2019, privately-held Forever 21, Inc. and seven affiliated Debtors (“Forever 21” or the “Debtors,” a "fast fashion" retailer) filed for Chapter 11 protection noting estimated assets between $1.0bn and $10.0bn; and estimated liabilities between $1.0bn and $10.0bn.
In documents filed with the Court, the Debtors "estimate that they owe approximately $350 million to their vendors as of the Petition Date" which matches the amount being provided in the Debtors' debtor-in-possession ("DIP") financing. The Debtors are insistent that they will honor their trade debt (and the DIP financing tends to back up that commitment in the short-term) in their pursuit of "keeping the American dream alive," but that $350.0mn of jettisonable unsecured debt will certainly be scrutinized by secured pre-petition (now DIP) lenders who will have their own dreams, theirs being slightly higher up the dream waterfall. The right-sizing will not come at their expense, so it will have to come at the expense of the founding Chang family, the unsecured creditors (vendors and landlords) or a mixture of both. How much of the Chang's American dream will be left to them upon emergence of the restructured Debtors?
In a press release announcing the filing, the Debtors advised that “Forever 21 intends to use these proceedings to facilitate a global restructuring that will allow the Company to focus on a profitable core part of its operations. As part of its restructuring strategy, the Company plans to exit most of its international locations in Asia and Europe, but will continue operations in Mexico and Latin America….Forever 21 will use these proceedings to right size its store base and return to basics that allowed the Company to thrive and grow into the fast fashion leader.
Linda Chang, the Debtors' Executive Vice President and daughter of founders Do Won and Jin Sook Chang, added: “With support from our key landlord and vendor constituents, we are confident we will emerge as a stronger, more competitive enterprise that is better positioned to prosper for years to come, and we remain committed to delivering the fast fashion trends that our customers have come to expect from Forever 21.”
Objectives of the Chapter 11 Filing
In a declaration in support of the Chapter 11 filing (the “Goulding Declaration”), Jonathan Goulding, the Debtors’ Chief Restructuring Officer, stated: "Forever 21 is a story about family and the 'American Dream.' In an age when retail, as most Americans know it, is under assault, Forever 21 intends to use these proceedings to remain viable and write a different ending from so many retail companies before it. The goal of these chapter 11 cases is clear: emerge with a viable and feasible standalone business and keep the dream alive.
Strong relationships with its vendors and landlords, that in many instances stretch close to 30 years, have served as a foundation for success. These relationships—carefully cultivated over the course of two plus decades—have been the backbone of Forever 21’s success since its inception. And it is these relationships that allowed Forever 21 to operate with very little funded debt, supported Forever 21 during its recent difficulties, resulting in virtually no cash-on-delivery demands or actions to “lock” Forever 21 out of its stores, and will be critical sources of support for Forever 21’s successful restructuring. Vendor relationships together with support from Forever 21’s longstanding landlord community will ensure the fresh start necessary to keep the dream alive—not only for the Changs and Forever 21, but for hundreds of vendors and thousands of employees who also have realized their dreams through Forever 21’s meteoric rise."
About the Prepetition Debtors
Founded in 1984, Forever 21, Inc., headquartered in Los Angeles, California, is a fast fashion retailer of women’s, men’s and kids clothing and accessories and is known for offering the hottest, most current fashion trends at a great value to consumers. Forever 21 delivers a curated assortment of new merchandise brought in daily.
As of the Petition Date, the Debtors operate 549 stores across the United States, and 251 stores are operated internationally by non-Debtor affiliates. Of the 251 international stores, 181 are owned and operated exclusively by the non-Debtor affiliates, 54 are franchises, and 16 are operated as joint ventures. The Debtors also maintain a substantial online presence, with their e-commerce platform accounting for approximately 16 percent of all sales. In addition to the 534 stores operated under the Forever 21 brand, the Debtors formed a beauty and wellness brand, Riley Rose, in 2017, which operates 15 stores in the United States.
Read more Bankruptcy News
The post Forever 21, Inc. – Further to Resolution of U.S. Trustee’s Objection, Court Grants Former Fashion Retailer’s Request for Procedures for Dismissal of Chapter 11 Cases appeared first on Daily Bankrupt Company Updates | Bankrupt Company News.