Quantcast
Channel: Daily Bankrupt Company Updates | Bankrupt Company News
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4593

8e14 Networks, Inc. – Court Approves Bidding Procedures and Stalking Horse Arrangements with VMware, Inc ($14.5mn Pacing Bid); Schedules October 24th Sale Hearing

0
0

September 6, 2022 – The Court hearing the 8e14 Networks case issued an order: (i) approving bidding procedures in respect of the Debtor's proposed sale of substantially all of its assets (the “Sale”), (ii) authorizing the Debtor to enter into stalking horse arrangements with VMware, Inc. (the "Buyer" or “Stalking Horse Bidder,” also the Debtor's DIP Lender, $14.5mn purchase price), including in respect of bidder protections and (iii) adopting a proposed auction/sale timetable culminating in an auction on October 19th and a sale hearing on October 24th. The Stalking Horse Bidder’s APA is attached as Exhibit B to Docket No. 41 with a September 1st amendment filed at Docket No. 102.

The APA amendment changes the purchase price from $12.5mn plus the Buyer's obligation to fund the Debtor's KEIP…to $14.5mn with responsibility for funding the KEIP now left to the Debtor.

On August 29th, the U.S. Trustee assigned to Debtor’s case objected to the Debtor’s bidding procedures motion, arguing unsuccessfully that proposed bidder protections (3% break-up fee and a $450k expense reimbursement) were excessive/bid chilling. The U.S. Trustee, which had also questioned whether the Debtor's auction/sale timetable was too rushed to allow for a fulsome marketing of the Debtor's assets, will have been reassured by the delay of each of the the bid deadlineline and auction by two weeks (although the sale hearing has been delayed by a more modest three days, leaving the overall timeline more or less intact).

Key Dates 

  • Bid Deadline: October 17, 2022
  • Auction (if necessary): October 19, 2022
  • Sale Objection Deadline: October 20, 2022
  • Sale Hearing: October 24, 2022

Case Status

On August 4, 2022, 8e14 Networks, Inc. (dba as Ananda Networks, “8e14” or the “Debtor”) filed for Chapter 11 protection (Subchapter V) noting assets between $10.0mn and $50.0mn; and liabilities between $10.0mn and $50.0mn. At filing, the Debtor, "a software company focused on the development and commercialization of security features, including virtual private network connections, zero-trust access, and network optimization capabilities," noted that "its operations do not yet generate sufficient working capital to be selfsustaining" without providing further detail as to operational or macro-economic challenges.

On September 6th, the Court hearing 8e14 Networks case issued a final DIP order authorizing the Debtor to access up to $2.0mn in new money debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) financing provided by VMWare, Inc. The Debtor had earlier been allowed to tap $1.1mn of the financing by a pair on interim DIP orders issued on August 10th [$450k, Docket No. 30] and August 16th [$650k, Docket No. 62], respectively.

Key Terms of the Amended APA

  • Seller: 8e14 Networks, Inc.
  • Buyer: VMware, Inc.
  • Purchase Price: The aggregate Purchase Price will be (a) $14,500,000 less the amount of the Buyer Debt Obligations (which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall be credit bid in accordance with Section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code) (the “Purchase Price”). At the Closing, Buyer will cause the balance of the Purchase Price to be wired to an account of Seller identified in writing to Buyer at least three Business Days prior to the Closing.
  • Bid Protections: 
    • Break-up fee: 3% of the Purchase Price
    • Expenses: Expense Reimbursement of up to $450k
    • Initial Overbid: $100k
  • 363 Sale Milestones(as required by DIP credit agreement):
    • The Debtor will have obtained entry of the Interim DIP Order, no later than four (4) Business Days after the Petition Date (Petition date was August 4th)
    • The Debtor will have filed the Sale Motion, no later than seven (7) Business Days after the Petition Date
    • The Debtor will have obtained entry of a Bankruptcy Court order granting the Sale Motion, no later than thirty-five (35) days after the Petition Date
    • The Debtor will have obtained entry of the Final DIP Order, no later than thirty-five (35) days after the Petition Date
    • The Debtor will conducted the auction described in the Sale Motion, no later than sixty-five (65) days after the Petition Date 
    • The Debtor will have obtained entry of a Bankruptcy Court order (satisfactory to the DIP Lender in its reasonable discretion) approving the Sale, no later than eighty-five (85) days after the Petition Date, or such later date as may be consented to by the DIP Lender
    • The Debtor will have consummated the Sale and, to the extent the Stalking Horse Asset Purchase Agreement is not the winning bid for the Debtor’s assets, no later than one hundred (100) days after the Petition Date, Debtor shall have used the cash proceeds at the closing thereof to cause, without duplication, all DIP Obligations to be paid in full, in cash, on a final and indefeasible basis, no later than ninety-five (95) days after the Petition Date.

Bidding Procedures Motion

The bidding procedures motion states, “While the Debtor’s business is revolutionary and its intellectual property is very valuable, its operations do not yet generate sufficient working capital to be self-sustaining. The Debtor’s management determined that a sale of substantially all of its assets would be the best path forward and in the best interests of its creditors and equity holders. The Debtor conducted several rounds of marketing efforts which failed due to a dispute with one of the Debtor’s founders.

Ultimately, as a result of that dispute and the Company exhausting its liquidity, this Chapter 11 case became necessary to complete such a sale. The proposed Bidding Procedures provide the Debtor with a cost-effective mechanism to realize value through the sale of the Debtor’s assets, which may be (but is not required to be) implemented through a Chapter 11 plan for the Debtor (the ‘Plan’).

Pursuant to the debtor-in-possession financing facility (the ‘DIP Facility’), the agreements governing such DIP Facility (the ‘DIP Agreement’), the first interim order approving such DIP Facility [Docket No. 30] (the ‘First Interim DIP Order’) and any further interim order (the ‘Second Interim DIP Order’) or final order approving the DIP Facility (the ‘Final Order,’ and collectively with the First Interim DIP Order and the Second Interim DIP Order, the ‘DIP Orders’), the Debtor must adhere to strict sale milestones and remain within the contemplated budget, all of which will require that a sale be promptly completed and the Debtor swiftly exist bankruptcy. To ensure compliance with the DIP Orders and to maximize the value to be received within the timeline contemplated, the proposed Bidding Procedures should be approved.”

Marketing Process

The motion continues: "Prior to commencing this Chapter 11 case, the Debtor undertook an extensive marketing process that ultimately led to the selection of the Stalking Horse Bidder and the Stalking Horse Bid, and the provision by the Stalking Horse Bidder of the DIP Facility. Nevertheless, because the Debtor desires to obtain a higher or better bid if such a bid is available, the Debtor has retained Rock Creek Advisors LLC (‘Rock Creek’) to, among other things, assist the Debtor in a marketing process for potential purchasers of the Debtor’s assets. The Debtor anticipates filing a plan that will provide a potential purchaser (including the stalking horse bidder) with the option to close such a purchase through a Plan (rather than through a standalone sale pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code) if the purchaser so desires. Consistent with that process, the Debtor now files this Motion seeking approval of Bidding Procedures to continue its marketing efforts and complete a sale of its assets in a manner that maximizes the value of the Debtor’s assets.

In consultation with Rock Creek, the Debtor has developed a list of parties whom they believe may be interested in, and whom the Debtor reasonably believes would have the financial resources to consummate a purchase of substantially all of the Debtor’s assets, either through a Plan or otherwise (a ‘Transaction’). The list of parties includes strategic investors and financial investors, including well-resourced parties that the Debtor had been in contact with as part of its prepetition marketing (collectively, the ‘Contact Parties’). The Debtor and Rock Creek will contact (to the extent not already contacted) the Contact Parties to explore their interest in pursuing a Transaction. The Contact Parties may include parties whom the Debtor or its advisors previously contacted regarding a transaction, regardless of whether such parties expressed any interest at such time in pursuing a transaction. The Debtor will continue to discuss and may supplement the list of Contact Parties throughout the marketing process, as appropriate."

About the Debtor

According to the Debtor: “Our founding team spent decades creating multiple cybersecurity and networking companies and products. We started Ananda Networks after realizing our 20th century networking and security paradigms are simply no longer relevant for our 21st century distributed, cloud enterprise. Rather than continue 'patching' the old network with numerous point products, such as firewalls, VPNs, NAC, MPLS and SD-WAN, it’s time to 'fix the network' and build it right from the ground up."

Read more Bankruptcy News

The post 8e14 Networks, Inc. – Court Approves Bidding Procedures and Stalking Horse Arrangements with VMware, Inc ($14.5mn Pacing Bid); Schedules October 24th Sale Hearing appeared first on Daily Bankrupt Company Updates | Bankrupt Company News.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4593

Latest Images

Trending Articles



click here for Latest and Popular articles on Mesothelioma and Asbestos


Latest Images